For disgaeawiki.info Christmas I got a fascinating present from a friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few simple prompts about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of writing, however it's also a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And photorum.eclat-mauve.fr there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, considering that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, pkd.ac.th based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can order any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag present", and canadasimple.com the books do not get offered even more.

He intends to broaden his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator shiapedia.1god.org trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without approval need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective however let's develop it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use creators' material on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of happiness," says the Baroness, pipewiki.org who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its best performing markets on the vague promise of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to assist them license their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, classicrock.awardspace.biz a national data library consisting of public data from a wide variety of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not sure the length of time I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.