Expert System (AI) is revolutionizing education while making finding out more available however also sparking arguments on its effect.

While students hail AI tools like ChatGPT for boosting their knowing experience, lecturers are raising issues about the growing reliance on AI, which they argue fosters laziness and weakens scholastic integrity, particularly with numerous trainees unable to protect their assignments or given works.

Prof. Isaac Nwaogwugwu, a lecturer at the University of Lagos, in an interview with Nairametrics, expressed frustration over the growing dependence on AI-generated reactions amongst students stating a current experience he had.

RelatedStories

Avoid sharing personal information that can identify you with AI tools- Expert alerts

Chinese AI app DeepSeek stimulates international tech selloff, challenges U.S. AI dominance

"I gave a project to my MBA trainees, and out of over 100 students, about 40% submitted the precise very same answers. These trainees did not even know each other, but they all used the exact same AI tool to generate their actions," he said.

He noted that this pattern prevails among both undergraduate and postgraduate students but is particularly concerning in part-time and range learning programs.

"AI is a major difficulty when it comes to assignments. Many students no longer believe critically-they just go on the internet, create responses, and send," he added.

Surprisingly, some speakers are also implicated of over-relying on AI, thatswhathappened.wiki setting a cycle where both teachers and trainees turn to AI for convenience instead of intellectual rigor.

This dispute raises crucial concerns about the function of AI in academic integrity and student development.

According to a UNESCO report, while ChatGPT reached 100 million monthly active users in January 2023, only one nation had released guidelines on generative AI since July 2023.

As of December 2024, ChatGPT had more than 300 million people utilizing the AI chatbot each week and 1 billion messages sent every day around the world.

Decline of scholastic rigor

University speakers are significantly worried about trainees submitting AI-generated assignments without truly understanding the content.

Dr. Felix Echekoba, a lecturer at Nnamdi Azikiwe University, expressed his issues to Nairametrics about students progressively counting on ChatGPT, just to deal with addressing standard questions when tested.

"Many students copy from ChatGPT and send sleek projects, however when asked standard questions, they go blank. It's frustrating because education is about finding out, not just passing courses," he said.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu mentioned that the increasing number of top-notch graduates can not be totally associated to AI but admitted that even high-performing students utilize these tools.
"A first-class trainee is a superior student, AI or not, however that doesn't indicate they do not cheat. The advantages of AI may be peripheral, however it is making trainees dependent and less analytical," he stated.

- Another speaker, Dr. Ereke, from Ebonyi State University, raised a different issue that some speakers themselves are guilty of the same practice.
"It's not just students using AI slackly. Some speakers, out of their own laziness, generate lesson notes, course lays out, marking plans, and even test questions with AI without examining them. Students in turn utilize AI to generate answers. It's a cycle of laziness and it is eliminating genuine knowing," he lamented.

Students' viewpoints on use

Students, on the other hand, state AI has enhanced their learning experience by making scholastic products more understandable and accessible.

- Eniola Arowosafe, a 300-level Business Administration trainee at Unilag, shared how AI has actually substantially aided her knowing by breaking down complex terms and offering summaries of prolonged texts.
"AI helped me comprehend things more quickly, especially when handling complicated topics," she explained.

However, she recalled an instance when she utilized AI to submit her task, only for her speaker to instantly acknowledge that it was created by ChatGPT and reject it. Eniola noted that it was a good-bad result.

- Bryan Okwuba, who recently finished with a first-rate degree in Pharmacy Technology from the University of Lagos, forum.batman.gainedge.org securely thinks that his academic success wasn't due to any AI tool. He attributes his outstanding grades to actively engaging by asking concerns and focusing on locations that speakers highlight in class, as they are frequently shown in examination questions.
"It's all about being present, paying attention, and tapping into the wealth of knowledge shared by my colleagues," he said,

- Tunde Awoshita, a final-year marketing student at UNIZIK, confesses to sometimes copying straight from ChatGPT when facing multiple deadlines.
"To be truthful, there are times I copy straight from ChatGPT when I have numerous due dates, and I know I'm guilty of that, the majority of times the speakers do not get to go through them, however AI has actually also helped me discover much faster."

Balancing AI's function in education

Experts believe the option depends on AI literacy; mentor students and speakers how to utilize AI as a knowing help rather than a faster way.

- Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, highlighted the combination of AI into Nigeria's education system, worrying the importance of a well balanced approach that keeps human participation while harnessing AI to enhance discovering outcomes.
"As we browse the quickly progressing landscape of Expert system (AI), it is vital that we prioritise human firm in education. We need to ensure that AI improves, instead of replaces, teachers' important role in shaping young minds," he stated

Concerns over AI in Learning

Dorcas Akintade, a cybersecurity change expert, attended to growing concerns regarding using artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT and their potential risks to the instructional system.

- She acknowledged the advantages of AI, however, stressed the need for care in its use.
- Akintade highlighted the increasing resistance among educators and schools toward including AI tools in discovering environments. She determined two primary reasons AI tools are discouraged in academic settings: security dangers and plagiarism. She explained that AI tools like ChatGPT are trained to react based upon user interactions, which may not line up with the expectations of educators.
"It is not taking a look at it as a tutor," Akintade said, describing that AI does not cater to particular teaching methods.

Plagiarism is another concern, as AI pulls from existing data, often without proper attribution

"A lot of individuals need to understand, like I stated, this is data that has actually been trained on. It is not just bringing things out from the sky. It's bringing details that some other individuals are fed into it, which in essence suggests that is another person's documentation," she cautioned.

- Additionally, Akintade highlighted an early problem in AI development referred to as "hallucination," where AI tools would create details that was not factual.
"Hallucination implied that it was highlighting details from the air. If ChatGPT could not get that info from you, it was going to make one up," she explained.

She suggested "grounding" AI by providing it with particular info to avoid such mistakes.

Navigating AI in Education

Akintade argued that prohibiting AI tools outright is not the option, particularly when AI presents an opportunity to leapfrog conventional academic techniques.

- She believes that regularly strengthening crucial info helps individuals remember and avoid making mistakes when faced with obstacles.
"Immersion brings conversion. When you inform people the same thing over and over again, when they are about to make the mistakes, then they'll keep in mind."

She likewise empasized the requirement for clear policies and procedures within schools, keeping in mind that many schools ought to deal with the individuals and of this use.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu has turned to in-class tasks and tests to counter AI-driven scholastic dishonesty.
"Now, I generally utilize assignments to make sure trainees provide original work." However, he acknowledged that handling large classes makes this approach hard.

"If you set complex concerns, trainees will not have the ability to utilize AI to get direct answers," he discussed.

He stressed the requirement for universities to train speakers on crafting examination concerns that AI can not quickly resolve while acknowledging that some speakers struggle to counter AI abuse due to an absence of technological awareness. "Some lecturers are analogue," he said.

- Nigeria released a draft National AI Strategy in August 2024, passfun.awardspace.us concentrating on ethical AI advancement with fairness, openness, accountability, and privacy at its core.
- UNESCO in a report requires the guideline of AI in education, recommending institutions to investigate algorithms, information, and outputs of generative AI tools to guarantee they fulfill ethical requirements, protect user information, and filter improper material.
- It stresses the need to assess the long-lasting impact of AI on important skills like thinking and creativity while creating policies that line up with ethical frameworks. Additionally, UNESCO suggests implementing age limitations for GenAI use to safeguard younger students and secure susceptible groups.
- For federal governments, it recommended embracing a collaborated national approach to regulating GenAI, consisting of developing oversight bodies and lining up regulations with existing data defense and personal privacy laws. It stresses evaluating AI dangers, implementing more stringent rules for high-risk applications, and guaranteeing nationwide data ownership.